Member checking trustworthiness essay

A database of thousands of authentic California Bar Exam essays from past examinations. Search for essays by year, topic, score, take practice exams, view bar grader feedback and more. Sign up and get started now trustworthiness. Finally in concluding that to ensure the rigor and trustworthiness, the qualitative researchers consider to do member checking, triangulation, detailed transcription, systematic plan and coding.

REFERENCES 1. Sandelowski M. Rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. ANS. The trustworthiness of results is the bedrock of high quality qualitative research. Member checking, also known as participant or respondent validation, is a technique for exploring the credibility of results.

Data or results are returned to participants to check for accuracy and resonance with their experiences. Member checking is often Typically, member checking is viewed as a technique for establishing to the validity of an account. Lincoln and Guba posit that this is the most crucial technique for establishing credibility.

However, this technique is controversial. Credibility contributes to a belief in the trustworthiness of data through the following attributes: (a) prolonged engagement; (b) persistent observations; (c) triangulation; (d) referential adequacy; (e) peer debriefing; and (f) member checks.

Triangulation and member checks are primary and commonly used methods to address credibility. A. K. Shenton Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects 65 b) the development of an early familiarity with the culture of participating or ganisations before the rst data collection dialogues take place.

Specifically, trustworthiness of the project was increased through the use of reflexivity, audit trail, triangulation, peer debriefing, member checking and prolonged engagement.

Description of the Research Project The research project described in this article is an autoethnography. Trustworthiness has been further divided into credibility, which corresponds roughly with the positivist concept of internal validity; dependability, which relates more to reliability; transferability, which is a form of external validity; and conrmability, which is largely an issue of presentation (Lincoln& Guba 1985, Graneheim& Lundman 2004).

Phone: (329) 459-5097 x 7018

Email: [email protected]